#epistemology #rationality # [[Epistemic status]] #shower-thought # Related - [[Getting stuck in local minima]] # Objectivity #to-digest Objectivity is often used even though everyone has a different [[The Map is not the Territory|map of the territory]]. >My use of the terms 'objective' and 'subjective' is not unlike Kant's. He uses the word 'objective' to indicate that scientific knowledge should be justifiable, independently of anybody's whim: a justification is 'objective' if in principle it can be tested and understood by anybody. 'If something is valid', he writes, 'for anybody in possession of his reason, then its grounds are objective and sufficient.' >~ [[Karl Popper]] I think humanity [[Common knowledge]] kind of agree on that point, though I slightly differ, because [[Plato's allegory|Our senses do not reflect reality]], it is not « anybody » but rather from the point of view of a universal intelligent observer that have full [[Philosophy/Epistemology/Knowledge|knowledge]] of [[Our universe]], even if it’s hardly concretely [[Physic]]ally possible In other words, human [[Philosophy/Rationality/Intelligence|organic intelligence]] is not objective. ## Arguing When Bob tells Alice her idea is bad, the result is the following: ![[Pasted image 20220705115610.png]]